STANDARDS: IFRS 4
INSURANCE CONTRACTS | |
---|---|
HISTORY OF IFRS 4 | |
1 April 2001 | Comprehensive insurance contracts project carried over from IASC to new IASB |
May 2002 | Short-term insurance contracts project split off from comprehensive project |
31 July 2003 | Exposure Draft ED 5 Insurance Contracts |
31 March 2004 | IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts |
1 January 2005 | Effective Date of IFRS 4 |
18 August 2005 | Amendment to IFRS 4 for financial guarantee contracts Click for More Information about this Amendment. Click for IASB Press Release (PDF 57k). |
RELATED INTERPRETATIONS | |
AMENDMENTS UNDER CONSIDERATION BY IASB | |
|
SUMMARY OF IFRS 4 | |
---|---|
Background IFRS 4 is the first guidance from the IASB on accounting for insurance contracts – but not the last. A Second Phase of the IASB's Insurance Project is under way. The Board issued IFRS 4 because it saw an urgent need for improved disclosures for insurance contracts, and modest improvements to recognition and measurement practices, in time for the adoption of IFRS by listed companies throughout Europe and elsewhere in 2005. The improvements to recognition and measurement are ones that will not likely have to be reversed when the IASB completes the second phase of the project. Summary of IFRS 4 Scope. IFRS 4 applies to virtually all insurance contracts (including reinsurance contracts) that an entity issues and to reinsurance contracts that it holds. It does not apply to other assets and liabilities of an insurer, such as financial assets and financial liabilities within the scope of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. Furthermore, it does not address accounting by policyholders. Definition of insurance contract. An insurance contract is a "contract under which one party (the insurer) accepts significant insurance risk from another party (the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the policyholder if a specified uncertain future event (the insured event) adversely affects the policyholder." Accounting policies. The IFRS exempts an insurer temporarily (until completion of Phase II of the Insurance Project) from some requirements of other IFRSs, including the requirement to consider the IASB's Framework in selecting accounting policies for insurance contracts. However, the IFRS:
Changes in accounting policies. IFRS 4 permits an insurer to change its accounting policies for insurance contracts only if, as a result, its financial statements present information that is more relevant and no less reliable, or more reliable and no less relevant. In particular, an insurer cannot introduce any of the following practices, although it may continue using accounting policies that involve them:
Remeasuring insurance liabilities. The IFRS permits the introduction of an accounting policy that involves remeasuring designated insurance liabilities consistently in each period to reflect current market interest rates (and, if the insurer so elects, other current estimates and assumptions). Without this permission, an insurer would have been required to apply the change in accounting policies consistently to all similar liabilities. Prudence. An insurer need not change its accounting policies for insurance contracts to eliminate excessive prudence. However, if an insurer already measures its insurance contracts with sufficient prudence, it should not introduce additional prudence. Future investment margins. There is a rebuttable presumption that an insurer's financial statements will become less relevant and reliable if it introduces an accounting policy that reflects future investment margins in the measurement of insurance contracts. Asset classifications. When an insurer changes its accounting policies for insurance liabilities, it may reclassify some or all financial assets as 'at fair value through profit or loss'. Other issues. The IFRS:
Disclosures. The IFRS requires disclosure of:
Effective date. Entities should apply the IFRS for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005, but earlier application is encouraged. An insurer need not apply some aspects of the IFRS to comparative information that relates to annual periods beginning before 1 January 2005. August 2005 Amendment to IAS 39 and IFRS 4 – Financial Guarantee Contracts On 18 August 2005, the IASB has amended the scope of IAS 39 to include financial guarantee contracts issued. However, if an issuer of financial guarantee contracts has previously asserted explicitly that it regards such contracts as insurance contracts and has used accounting applicable to insurance contracts, the issuer may elect to apply either IAS 39 or IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts to such financial guarantee contracts. A financial guarantee contract is a contract that requires the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due. Under IAS 39 as amended, financial guarantee contracts are initially recognised at fair value and are subsequently measured at the greater of (a) the amount determined in accordance with IAS 37 and (b) the amount initially recognised less, where appropriate, cumulative amortisation recognised in accordance with IAS 18. The issuer may make that election contract by contract, but the election for each contract is irrevocable. The amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 4 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2006, with earlier application encouraged. |
RATING AGENCY ANALYSIS OF IFRS 4 | |
---|---|
Fitch Ratings – a leading global fixed income rating agency – has analysed the implications of IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts and has concluded that Fitch "does not expect any rating actions as a direct result of the move to IFRS. However, Fitch cannot rule out the possibility that the additional disclosure and information contained in the accounts could lead to rating changes due to an improved perception of risk based on the enhanced information available." The special report Mind the GAAP: Fitch's View on Insurance IFRS provides an overview of IFRS 4 and the issues being addressed in Phase II of the IASB's insurance project; assesses the implications including increased volatility, greater use of discounting and fair values, changes to income recognition, and enhanced disclosures; and discusses how the changes affect ratings analysis. An excerpt:
|