培训课程
STANDARDS: IFRS 1
| FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS | |
|---|---|
| HISTORY OF IFRS 1 | |
| September 2001 | Project added to IASB agenda |
| July 2002 | Exposure Draft ED 1 First-time Application of IFRSs issued. Comment deadline 31 October 2002. Click for a Two-Page Overview of the ED (PDF 18k). |
| June 2003 | IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of IFRSs issued. It is summarised below. Or click for a Four-Page Summary of IFRS 1 in Q&A Format (PDF 49k). |
| 1 January 2004 | Effective date of IFRS 1 is for the first IFRS financial statements for a period beginning on or after 1 January 2004 |
| 30 June 2005 | Small Amendment of IFRS 1 relating to IFRS 6 Click to Download the IASB Press Release (PDF 48k). |
| RELATED INTERPRETATIONS | |
| |
| AMENDMENTS UNDER CONSIDERATION | |
| SUMMARY OF IFRS 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Objective IFRS 1, First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, sets out the procedures that an entity must follow when it adopts IFRSs for the first time as the basis for preparing its general purpose financial statements. Definition of first-time adoption A first-time adopter is an entity that, for the first time, makes an explicit and unreserved statement that its general purpose financial statements comply with IFRSs. An entity may be a first-time adopter if, in the preceding year, it prepared IFRS financial statements for internal management use, as long as those IFRS financial statements were not and given to owners or external parties such as investors or creditors. If a set of IFRS financial statements was, for any reason, given to an external party in the preceding year, then the entity will already be considered to be on IFRSs, and IFRS 1 does not apply. An entity can also be a first-time adopter if, in the preceding year, its published financial statements asserted:
Effective date of IFRS 1 IFRS 1 applies if an entity's first IFRS financial statements are for a period beginning on or after 1 January 2004. Earlier application is encouraged. Overview for an entity that adopts IFRSs for the first time in its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005
Adjustments required to move from previous GAAP to IFRSs at the time of first-time adoption 1. Derecognition of some old assets and liabilities. The entity should eliminate previous-GAAP assets and liabilities from the opening balance sheet if they do not qualify for recognition under IFRSs. For example:
a. IAS 38 does not permit recognition of expenditure on any of the following as an intangible asset:
b. If the entity's previous GAAP had allowed accrual of liabilities for "general reserves", restructurings, future operating losses, or major overhauls that do not meet the conditions for recognition as a provision under IAS 37, these are eliminated in the opening IFRS balance sheet. c. If the entity's previous GAAP had allowed recognition of reimbursements and contingent assets that are not virtually certain, these are eliminated in the opening IFRS balance sheet. 2. Recognition of some new assets and liabilities. Conversely, the entity should recognise all assets and liabilities that are required to be recognised by IFRS even if they were never recognised under previous GAAP. For example:
a. IAS 39 requires recognition of all derivative financial assets and liabilities, including embedded derivatives. These were not recognised under many local GAAPs.
b. IAS 19 requires an employer to recognise its liabilities under defined benefit plans. These are not just pension liabilities but also obligations for medical and life insurance, vacations, termination benefits, and deferred compensation. In the case of "over-funded" plans, this would be a defined benefit asset. c. IAS 37 requires recognition of provisions as liabilities. Examples could include an entity's obligations for restructurings, onerous contracts, decommissioning, remediation, site restoration, warranties, guarantees, and litigation. d. Deferred tax assets and liabilities would be recognised in conformity with IAS 12. 3. Reclassification. The entity should reclassify previous-GAAP opening balance sheet items into the appropriate IFRS classification. Examples: a. IAS 10 does not permit classifying dividends declared or proposed after the balance sheet date as a liability at the balance sheet date. In the opening IFRS balance sheet these would be reclassified as a component of retained earnings. b. If the entity's previous GAAP had allowed treasury stock (an entity's own shares that it had purchased) to be reported as an asset, it would be reclassified as a component of equity under IFRS. c. Items classified as identifiable intangible assets in a business combination accounted for under the previous GAAP may be required to be classified as goodwill under IAS 22 because they do not meet the definition of an intangible asset under IAS 38. The converse may also be true in some cases. These items must be reclassified. d. IAS 32 has principles for classifying items as financial liabilities or equity. Thus mandatorily redeemable preferred shares and puttable shares that may have been classified as equity under previous GAAP would be reclassified as liabilities in the opening IFRS balance sheet.
e. The reclassification principle would apply for the purpose of defining reportable segments under IAS 14. f. The scope of consolidation might change depending on the consistency of the previous-GAAP requirements to those in IAS 27. In some cases, IFRS will require consolidated financial statements where they were not required before. g. Some offsetting (netting) of assets and liabilities or of income and expense items that had been acceptable under previous GAAP may no longer be acceptable under IFRS. 4. Measurement. The general measurement principle – there are several significant exceptions noted below – is to apply IFRS in measuring all recognised assets and liabilities. Therefore, if an entity adopts IFRS for the first time in its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005, in general it would use the measurement principles in IFRSs in force at 31 December 2005. 5. Adjustments required to move from previous GAAP to IFRS at the time of first-time adoption. These should be recognised directly in retained earnings or other appropriate category of equity at the date of transition to IFRSs. How to recognise adjustments required to move from previous GAAP to IFRSs Adjustments required to move from previous GAAP to IFRSs at the time of first-time adoption should be recognised directly in retained earnings or, if appropriate, another category of equity at the date of transition to IFRSs. Exceptions to the basic measurement principle in IFRS 1 1. Optional exceptions. There are some important exceptions to the general restatement and measurement principles set out above. The following exceptions are individually optional, not mandatory: Business combinations that occurred before opening balance sheet date
a. An entity may keep the original previous-GAAP accounting, that is, not restate:
b. However, should it wish to do so, an entity can elect to restate all business combinations starting from a date it selects prior to the opening balance sheet date. c. In all cases, the entity must make an initial IAS 36 impairment test of any remaining goodwill in the opening IFRS balance sheet, after reclassifying, as appropriate, previous GAAP intangibles to goodwill. d. IFRS 1 includes an appendix explaining how a first-time adopter should account for business combinations that occurred prior to transition to IFRS. Property, plant, and equipment, intangible assets, and investment property carried under the cost model
a. These assets may be measured at their fair value at the opening IFRS balance sheet date (this option applies to intangible assets only if an active market exists). Fair value becomes the "deemed cost" going forward under the IFRS cost model. (Deemed cost is an amount used as a surrogate for cost or depreciated cost at a given date.)
b. If, before the date of its first IFRS balance sheet, the entity had revalued any of these assets under its previous GAAP either to fair value or to a price-index-adjusted cost, that previous-GAAP revalued amount at the date of the revaluation can become the deemed cost of the asset under IFRS. c. If, before the date of its first IFRS balance sheet, the entity had made a one-time revaluation of assets or liabilities to fair value because of a privatisation or initial public offering, and the revalued amount became deemed cost under the previous GAAP, that amount (adjusted for any subsequent depreciation, amortisation, and impairment) would continue to be deemed cost after the initial adoption of IFRS. IAS 19 - Employee benefits: actuarial gains and losses An entity may elect to recognise all cumulative actuarial gains and losses for all defined benefit plans at the opening IFRS balance sheet date (that is, reset any corridor recognised under previous GAAP to zero), even if it elects to use the IAS 19 corridor approach for actuarial gains and losses that arise after first-time adoption of IFRS. If an entity does not elect to apply this exemption, it must restate all defined benefit plans under IAS 19 since the inception of those plans (which may differ from the effective date of IAS 19). IAS 21 - Accumulated translation reserves An entity may elect to recognise all translation adjustments arising on the translation of the financial statements of foreign entities in accumulated profits or losses at the opening IFRS balance sheet date (that is, reset the translation reserve included in equity under previous GAAP to zero). If the entity elects this exemption, the gain or loss on subsequent disposal of the foreign entity will be adjusted only by those accumulated translation adjustments arising after the opening IFRS balance sheet date. If the entity does not elect to apply this exemption, it must restate the translation reserve for all foreign entities since they were acquired or created. 2. Mandatory exceptions. There are also three important exceptions to the general restatement and measurement principles set out above that are mandatory, not optional. These are: IAS 39 - Derecognition of financial instruments A first-time adopter is not permitted to recognise financial assets or financial liabilities that had been derecognised under its previous GAAP in a financial year beginning before 1 January 2001 (the effective date of IAS 39). This is consistent with the transition provision in IAS 39.172(a). However, if an SPE was used to effect the derecognition of financial instruments and the SPE is controlled at the opening IFRS balance sheet date, the SPE must be consolidated. IAS 39 - Hedge accounting The conditions in IAS 39.122-152 for a hedging relationship that qualifies for hedge accounting are applied as of the opening IFRS balance sheet date. The hedge accounting practices, if any, that were used in periods prior to the opening IFRS balance sheet may not be retrospectively changed. This is consistent with the transition provision in IAS 39.172(b). Some adjustments may be needed to take account of the existing hedging relationships under previous GAAP at the opening balance sheet date. Information to be used in preparing IFRS estimates retrospectively In preparing IFRS estimates retrospectively, the entity must use the inputs and assumptions that had been used to determine previous GAAP estimates in periods before the date of transition to IFRS, provided that those inputs and assumptions are consistent with IFRS. The entity is not permitted to use information that became available only after the previous-GAAP estimates were made except to correct an error. Changes to disclosures For many entities, new areas of disclosure will be added that were not requirements under the previous GAAP (perhaps segment information, earnings per share, discontinuing operations, contingencies, and fair values of all financial instruments) and disclosures that had been required under previous GAAP will be broadened (perhaps related party disclosures). Disclosure of selected financial data for periods before the first IFRS balance sheet IAS 1 only requires one year of full comparative financial statements. If a first-time adopter wants to disclose selected financial information for periods before the date of the opening IFRS balance sheet, it is not required to conform that information to IFRS. Conforming that earlier selected financial information to IFRSs is optional. If the entity elects to present the earlier selected financial information based on its previous GAAP rather than IFRS, it must prominently label that earlier information as not complying with IFRS and, further, it must disclose the nature of the main adjustments that would make that information comply with IFRS. This latter disclosure is narrative and not necessarily quantified. Of course, if the entity elects to present more than one year of full comparative prior period financial statements at the time of its transition to IFRSs, that will change the date of the opening IFRS balance sheet. Disclosures in the financial statements of a first-time adopter IFRS 1 requires disclosures that explain how the transition from previous GAAP to IFRS affected the entity's reported financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This includes: 1. Reconciliations of equity reported under previous GAAP to equity under IFRS both (a) at the date of the opening IFRS balance sheet and (b) the end of the last annual period reported under the previous GAAP. For an entity adopting IFRSs for the first time in its 31 December 2005 financial statements, the reconciliations would be as of 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2004. 2. Reconciliations of profit or loss for the last annual period reported under the previous GAAP to profit or loss under IFRSs for the same period. 3. Explanation of material adjustments that were made, in adopting IFRSs for the first time, to the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. 4. If errors in previous-GAAP financial statements were discovered in the course of transition to IFRSs, those must be separately disclosed. 5. If the entity recognised or reversed any impairment losses in preparing its opening IFRS balance sheet, these must be disclosed. 6. Appropriate explanations if the entity has availed itself of any of the specific recognition and measurement exemptions permitted under IFRS 1 - for instance, if it used fair values as deemed cost. Disclosure of an impending change to IFRS If an entity is going to adopt IFRS for the first time in its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005, certain disclosure are required in its interim financial statements prior to the 31 December 2005 statements, but only those interim financial statements purport to comply with IAS 34. Explanatory information and a reconciliation are required in the interim report that immediately precedes the first set of IFRS annual financial statements. The information includes changes in accounting policies compared to those under previous GAAP. Compliance in interim reports in the year of first-time adoption of IFRS If an entity that adopts IFRS for the first time in its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2005, it is required to apply IFRS 1 in its interim financial reports for periods within the year ended 31 December 2005 if those interim reports are described as conforming to International Financial Reporting Standards. It would not be required to apply IFRS 1 if those interim reports are described as conforming to previous GAAP. Different IFRS adoption dates of investor and investee A parent or investor may become a first-time adopter earlier than or later than its subsidiary, associate, or joint venture investee. In these cases, IFRS 1 is applied as follows: 1. If the subsidiary has adopted IFRSs in its entity-only financial statements before the group to which it belongs adopts IFRS for the consolidated financial statements, then the subsidiary's first-time adoption date is still the date at which it adopted IFRS for the first-time, not that of the group. However, the group must use the IFRS measurements of the subsidiary's assets and liabilities for its first IFRS financial statements except for adjustments relating to the business combinations exemption and to conform group accounting policies. 2. If the group adopts IFRSs before the subsidiary adopts IFRSs in its entity-only financial statements, then the subsidiary has an option either (a) to elect that the group date of IFRS adoption is its transition date or (b) to first-time adopt in its entity-only financial statements. 3. If the group adopts IFRSs before the parent adopts IFRSs in its entity-only financial statements, then the parent's first-time adoption date is the date at which the group adopted IFRSs for the first time. 4. If the group adopts IFRSs before its associate or joint venture adopts IFRSs in its entity-only financial statements, then the associate or joint venture should have the option to elect that either the group date of IFRS adoption is its transition date or to first-time adopt in its entity-only financial statements. June 2005: Amendments to IFRS 6 and IFRS 1 Adopted On 30 June 2005 the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 1 and IFRS 6 to clarify that an entity that both (a) adopts IFRSs for the first time before 1 January 2006 and (b) applies IFRS 6 before that date is exempted not only from providing comparative prior-period disclosures but also from applying the recognition and measurement requirements of IFRS 6 in the prior comparative period. Click to Download the IASB Press Release (PDF 48k). March 2006: IASB Agenda Proposal — Amendment to IFRS 1 with respect to determining cost of subsidiaries in separate financial statements of a parent The IASB considered a proposal to prepare an amendment to IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of IFRSs to address problems in the separate financial statements of the parent.
These issues had been raised to the IFRIC. The IFIRC referred them to the IASB on the grounds that this is not a matter of interpretation, the standards are clear and do not provide any basis for granting the relief sought. The staff stated that preparing the amendment would not consume excessive resources. The Board concurred and agreed to add this project to its agenda. It was noted that, although an amendment to IFRS 1, the amendment would not affect the stable platform (because it applied only to separate financial statements) and would help IFRSs gain wider acceptance. | |||
